It’s the start of a new year and a chance to earn money while taking pictures.
You started in photography like all the rest of us being an amateur that got pleasure from using a camera slightly higher than others and who may have gotten enjoyment from playing baseball, dancing paint, shooting fast-moving rivers, shooting craps or perhaps at school.
It’s not that you didn’t take part in some of these other things; however, taking photographs created a resonance in you, and it has been in constant motion throughout the years. It was a good feeling to hold a camera. comfortable and good. The heavier the camera, the better. The shutter’s sound was like music.
Returning things from the lab was something like Christmas. Nowadays, if you work digitally, the pleasure of being able to see an image in a flash is incredible.
This blend of joy and expertise (it’s plausible to suppose that you got better at taking photos the more you did it) gets even more sweeter when someone else offers you a payment for what you do. The compensation can start out as little as some free tickets to a local show in exchange for capturing publicity stills. Maybe a little fee for taking portraits of people in your neighborhood.
If you do it for a long time as my wife Judy and I have – and taking photos for money which is also known as “commercial photography,” can generate a decent income.
In the meantime let’s put aside the argument about what constitutes art (it surely is) and instead focus on photography as a marketable product. A product you offer and sell in the marketplace.
In a world economy as one like ours influences the cost that your products will fetch. Naturally, there are different factors that come into play. (Whether you’re operating in closed systems such as an open system, in which case you have, in essence the monopoly.) But, since that is practically unheard of within commercial photography the fact is the same: if it is possible to get a higher price for the services you’re offering, that is the most appropriate price for you. Actually, it’s an appropriate price, no matter what. Visit:- https://fearlesselopement.com/
So why is it, then, that a mouthy foolish fool of CBS MarketWatch recently pronounced wedding photography as one of the most popular types of commercial photography as one of the “ten most overpaid jobs in the US”?
“Photographers typically charge $2,000 to $5,000 to shoot a wedding, for what amounts to a one-day assignment plus processing time,” MarketWatch personal finance editor Chris Plummer said in a recent online article. “Yet many mope through the job, bumping guests in their way without apology, with the attitude: ‘I’m just doing this for the money until Time or National Geographic calls.’”
I read this scathing screed with a rising amount of puss. Judy as well as I’ve been in the business for over 20 years. At one point in our careers, we were doing 50 weddings per year, alongside all of our other commercial work. Nowadays, we shoot about half that number, still perform a great deal of commercial shooting, and also work on books. Wedding work is simply that it is work. I’m happy that our wedding workload is less. It’s funny that I never saw it as a one-a-day lark to rake in easy bucks.
However, Plummer did have a lot to say.
“They [wedding photographers] must cover equipment and film-development costs. Still, many in major metropolitan areas who shoot weddings each weekend in the May-to-October marrying season pull in $100,000 for six months’ work.”
Here, I’m reminded about my uncle Terry, a special ed. teacher from New Jersey. Oh how she likes to trim people down to size when they say that they would like to take two months off each summer. For the record: in terms of mental stress , taking care of your children all day long, non-school work, and other unheralded and non-paid aspects of the work, elementary school teachers easily complete the equivalent of a year’s worth of work, or much more, in the ten months when they are “in.” And they don’t get paid at all what they’re worth.
Concerning wedding photographers Let’s go over the following: Plummer maintains that we often work grudgingly (on weekends) for the majority of the year. After that, we probably relax with their “winnings,” vacationing in warmer locales during the winter “non-marrying season” until May arrives and brings with it an opportunity to make money from another group of eye-catching suckers.
And for all that, he says: “…[L]et’s face it most the work they produce is mediocre. Have you ever really been wowed flipping around in the bridal album handed you by newlyweds? Annie Leibovitz and Richard Avedon aren’t, but they charge fees to appear as if they’re both in the same league.”
Before I go into my reasons to disagree with Chris Plummer, let me list the other nine “most overpaid” jobs on his list. In the end, we had a good time: wedding photographers came in at the bottom of the list, at number 10. In reverse order, and ending with the ones who were allegedly the highest paid list the following: 9. pilots for the major airline companies, 8.West Coast longshoremen(7. Airport skycaps, 6. Realtors selling luxurious homes, five. motivational speakers , ex-politicians and motivational speakers in the lecture circuit 4. Orthodontists, 3. CEOs of companies that are not performing 2. washed-up athletes in long-term contracts. mutual fund managers.
I’m not qualified enough to provide any specific information or preciseness regarding these other nine areas (neither, come to think of it, was Plummer however, this did not hinder him from doing his job) so I’ll let orthodontists and longshoremen speak for themselves.
However, as a photographer who shoots weddings, I want to share a few thoughts I want to say.
Plummer is correct about wedding photography rates. The $2,000-$5,000 range is about exactly. We’ll be honest, our average wedding runs between $3500 and $4000.The range is about right. Prices can be out of the norm for some of the wedding photo “stars” like Dennis Reggie.
The price is the only thing that Plummer is able to do.
Photographing a wedding is just a day job? In your dreams, Chris. The thing he isn’t taking into account (because I’m sure he has no idea the subject matter he’s talking about) is that this kind of photography is a personaland hands-on affair. Sure, as in every industry, there will be people who try to sell a bride an event package she does not need but the majority of people I know working in this field are part artist, part journalist or psychologist. The basic preparations prior to the wedding can be a long time. First there’s the initial meeting with the client to demonstrate your abilities. When you’ve got that job literally may spend hours discussing the final details as well as lists of formal and group photos the process could involve a amount of group dynamics and family tension. [I’m not even mentioning the possibility of visiting places you’ve never worked before, or visits to a place to see what the light is like during a specific time of the year. A professional will do this.